The Variable Frequency Oscillator ~ aka “Grief in a Box”.
Image Courtesy: Wikipedia under CC License.
Whether you have an appliance radio (store bought) or one that you made with your own hands somewhere buried in the innards is a variable frequency oscillator. However if you are running a single channel fixed frequency device such as a crystal controlled transmitter or receiver then maybe that is not the case. The acid test is if you move a knob or mouse pointer and you are able to change the frequency, then you have a VFO. A special case may be the VXO which is a variable crystal oscillator which uses the properties of a quartz crystal to shift its frequency of oscillation over a small range. But the VXO usually has a knob adjusting a variable capacitor or a pot controlling a voltage variable capacitor.
But I really want to focus on the knob turning, mouse pointing variety of variable frequency oscillator. There are various ways to generate a variable frequency starting with the very early approach involving analog circuits where an inductor and capacitor formed the very heart of the VFO. When an inductor and capacitor are linked up, either in series with each other or in parallel, a resonant circuit is formed. If this combination is placed in an amplifier circuit and certain conditions are met with respect to internally generated feedback the circuit will oscillate at a frequency determined mostly by the inductor and capacitor values. Other factors that impact the actual frequency of oscillation include stray capacitance and/or inductance as a result of component lead lengths. For these reasons most VFO construction tutorials stress short direct connections and isolation from other circuit elements.
There are many types of analog VFO circuits with names like Hartley, Colpitts, Clapp, Vacker, Seiler, Franklin, ECO. The difference among these types basically is how the L and C are combined (series or parallel), the method of achieving feedback, where the load is placed and finally the coupling to the load. Some of these circuits are very load sensitive and you will frequently see some sort of follow on buffer amplifier to isolate the actual load (such as a mixer stage or convertor stage) from the oscillator itself. Below are two examples of oscillators with the first being a Hartley and the second called a Vackar. [The naming typically follows the person who invented the circuit.]
|The Basic Hartley circuit (parallel L and C) |
|Vackar Circuit with L and Co in Series |
For those who have an insatiable desire to know where every nut and bolt is hiding there are many factors concealed in the bushes as to why the circuit oscillates. Some factors have to do with the physics of inductors and their response to being charged and collapsing electric fields while others have to do with capacitance discharge rates and flywheel effects. I do not plan to cover these other than to recognize that certain conditions have to be met for an analog circuit to oscillate.
Here is part of why I used the term “grief in the box “– getting a circuit to oscillate is but a slice of the pie as then the builder is confronted with keeping the circuit in the oscillating state over the desired range. When you twiddle the knob or move the mouse pointer the objective is to keep it oscillating over the entire tuning range. That does not always happen.
Another pie slice is oscillator stability which has several subsets. There is the “drift factor’ manifest as either “initial turn on drift” where as the circuit elements heat up from a cold start the frequency will drift. This can be a very large amount in the range of several hundred hertz to kilohertz. Capacitors especially are subject to temperature drift and the inductor as well will respond to temperature changes.
Another drift factor is “long term drift” where after the initial “turn on drift”, over time the frequency will shift albeit usually a smaller amount. Turn on drift as stated may be in order of magnitude of kilohertz whereas the long term may be 100 Hertz. Fifty years ago a few kilohertz drift was common. Today the Flex Radio Operators on 40 Meters will scream at you if your rig moves 10 Hertz — so with progress there are some penalties.
Yet another form of drift is the result of poor mechanical construction of the VFO. If your inductor flops around –the VFO will change frequency. If you move your hand near the inductor it will change frequency and even blowing cold or hot air on the inductor will change the VFO frequency. You get the drift (pun guys).
Other issues include “FMming” a term often applied to certain older boat anchor inexpensive commercial appliance radios that lacked good voltage regulation. Typically these vintage radios featured 500 watt sweep tubes and with a marginal power supply on voice peaks the VFO regulation suffered. The result is the SSB signal frequency that varied with voice peaks –thus frequency modulation. Before we leave VFO voltage regulation that is an issue in itself as the lack of adequate voltage regulation results in frequency drift.
A similar problem was when the VFO was built “al fresco” with no shielding such that the output RF signal was being picked up in the VFO circuitry and this results in distortion.
Hopefully now you understand why I call it “Grief in a Box”! But in examining all of these maladies there is a general approach that cures many of these problems and most of the cures are physical in nature. So for those contemplating building an analog VFO behind the schematic is a host of factors that if properly addressed will assure a success. Lets us examine some of the physical factors.
The components themselves are one factor. Use NPO temperature coefficient capacitors and use multiple caps in parallel. Capacitors have AC current passing through them which cause a heating of the cap. If you have say a 100 PF cap in parallel with a 50 PF variable cap to set the band range then use ten 10 PF caps in parallel as then each caps is drawing 1/10 the current and the heating of each individual cap is dramatically reduced. While you are at it the 50 PF variable must be a double bearing type (supported at both ends). This keeps the cap linear and not subject to vibration. Old style brass capacitors work the best but may not be readily available.
Inductors are very subject to temperature and mechanical impacts. Air wound inductors seems to be the best BUT how you mount them may negate their otherwise excellent properties. Frequently the inductors are wound on a grooved ceramic core or on a cardboard form that has been varnished. Keeping an inductor away from the chassis or walls of an enclosure is an art. Ceramic pillars are often used for this chore. One other approach is to super glue the air wound inductor to a 1/4 inch thick piece of plexiglass which is then mounted on the pillars.
Physical isolation is another factor. High quality VFO’s are built in shielded enclosures and power is fed to the VFO via “feedthrough” capacitors. The signal output is best done utilizing SMA connectors. Real die hard VFO builders will put the Inductor and Capacitor in one box and the electronics in another box where the two boxes are interconnected with a short length of RG174/U 52 Ohm coax. This approach isolates any heat from the frequency determining elements.
The build itself should utilize short direct connections over a common ground plane. This is where a Manhattan style build could result in an extremely “solid” VFO. For best results do not utilize Zener regulators but instead a three terminal type such as the 78L08. That is another point use the minimum amount of voltage to sustain reliable operation. This reduces circuit heating thereby impacting the drift in the least amount possible. Further amplification of the VFO signal can be done externally.
Mechanical factors must be addressed wherein any vibrations or mechanical movement will cause movement of components in the VFO itself. One the earliest frequency agile ham transmitters was the self-excited Hartley oscillator which frequently used a type 45 tube. Essentially this jewel was a keyed VFO built on a wooden breadboard. This was a pure example of “al fresco construction” . Literature of the time cautioned that the operator must place the transmitter on a shelf above the operating table as the mere act of striking the Morse key would transmit vibrations to the transmitter and the signal would vary in frequency based purely on the movement of the key. The physical isolation solved that problem. The second caution was to insure the antenna was taut — if the antenna moved with a breeze it would present a variable load to the oscillator and the frequency would shift. A hefty mechanically sound enclosure serves two purposes: one is to shield the VFO and secondly to reduce the impact of mechanical vibrations.
Voltage regulation is key as mentioned earlier. Resist using Zener diodes and resort to stout three terminal regulators. You ask why? — Most of the three terminal regulators feature internal temperature compensation to keep the output constant –Zener diodes do not. Very sophisticated regulation circuits will keep the output constant even when subjected to wild swings in the input side. Lack of voltage regulation and heating of the circuits (especially with tube type vfo’s) frequently resulted in a chirpy signal especially if one were keying a VFO for CW operation. The message here is to use the lowest voltage practical to sustain oscillation as this facilitates maintaining the applied voltage and reduces the device dissipation which in turn generates less heat.
Once you have the VFO built typically some sort of gear reduction drive mechanism coupled with a mechanical readout like a circular dial is fixed to the capacitor shaft. Careful alignment is required so that no stresses are introduced into the capacitor shaft (ie binding) such that the assembly lacks smooth tuning. This takes time to get it right!
Finally –don’t be greedy! Select a reasonable tuning range like 500 kHz for your VFO as this satisfies several factors one of which is stability and another is linearity. The ultimate goal is to have the same degree of movement at one end of the VFO range produce the exact same increment of change at the other end. Did I mention that a smaller range facilitates the use of reduction drives to give you “fine tuning”.
The above cover much of the well known cautions and tribal knowledge in analog VFO construction and if you are looking for a simplification in building an stable analog VFO –there is none! There is much effort involved if you want to have a stable VFO. Translate this to hours and days of work versus a hour with some wire wrap tools and 30 Minutes writing some code for an Arduino. Unless time is well spent on analog VFO construction you will have grief in a box!
Above all feel free to add your additional comments on how to avoid “Grief in a Box”.